NEWS REPORTS 2006
For news from 2005 please
click here
For news from 2004 please
click here
For news from 2003 and 2002 please click here
December
Rape Appeal
Less than 15% of rapes are reported. Only 1 in 5 reported
rapes make it to court and only 6% result in conviction. Support Fawcett's
campaign - pledge your support or make a donation and help get justice for
women. See
Rape Appeal
Ipswich Murders
A number of our members who work with prostituted women and/or
who are academics in universities have been approached for comments about the
murders of women in Ipswich. The sort of comment wanted by most journalists has
been a criminal profile of the perpetrator - in the style of CSI or Cracker. Our
members do not give comments of this type and thankfully one journalist has
written about the sort of pseudo 'criminologists' who are revitalising their
careers by giving comments - mainly disparaging the dead women. Catherine
Bennett in The Guardian (14th Dec 2006) writes about how academics such as Dr
Michael Berry of Manchester Metropolitan University, share "some of the
perpetrator's supposed feelings about prostitutes, vis-a-vis women" through
insights such as "I think quite clearly this guy has been targeting prostitutes
rather than women". She goes on to say "We can only hope that, just as
prostitutes are said to differ from women, a similar gulf exists between those
who have been lost to behavioural investigative analysis (amateur and
professional) and people". (Read
full article here)
The TAR campaign thanks Catherine for her article and joins
her in denouncing the 'criminologists' who are scoring big brownie points for
their own careers. There are plenty of good criminologists out there who are
refusing to engage with the media hype which is mythologizing this killer by
upgrading him to 'Ripper' in the face of the simultaneous downgrading of his
victims. Referred to as 'prostitutes', 'girls', 'vice girls'. 'hookers', or
merely by their first names (as if they were children), or as 'drug addicts' or
even by the colour of their hair 'blonde Gemma' - the media refer to them as
though they were Page Three girls - the only similarity being that their bodies
are naked. Rarely are they called 'women' and it has also been noticed that the
police are taking great care in avoiding calling the killer 'he' - preferring
the gender neutral 'person'. The Sun (13th Dec) cites an un-named 'top criminal
psychologist' who claims the killer is "likely to be a loner with a history of
being dominated by women". Blimey, consider the number of woman who have been
dominated by men - one would assume there would be killing sprees in every
corner of the planet, every day of the week. It has also been suggested that the
killer has had a bad experience with a prostitute - one bad screw or blowjob is
obviously enough justification to trigger numerous random killings. Here is our
criminal profile of the killer and all journalists should feel free to use it -
the killer is a man.
Joan Smith's book, Misogynies, discusses many of these issues
in relation to the case of Peter Sutcliffe. We should remember that women are
killed every week and it is only the frequency and geographically specific
nature of these murders, together with the thrill that some people get from such
cases, that make them newsworthy.
Email
(Again)
Fortunately our email service is now available again. Two of
the campaign members will be providing this service and we thank them for
stepping in to do this. If you need to contact the campaign the email address is
campaign@truthaboutrape.co.uk
Rape in the News
In the run up to Christmas, the news is full of stories of
rape. These were collected from just one day but the truth about rape is
that these are merely the ones that have made the headlines - many more rapes
have occurred which we will never know about. If you are a woman who has
experienced sexual violence at any time in your life and would like to talk with
another woman, please contact your nearest rape crisis centre where you will
find understanding and support ...
www.rapecrisis.org.uk
A failed asylum seeker convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl
is to be awarded damages after a judge ruled he was unlawfully detained in
prison.
Read more here
A 15-year-old boy has appeared in court charged with the rape
of an eight-year-old boy and the attempted abduction of a girl aged nine.
Read more here
A convicted serial rapist who was out on licence after serving
10 years in prison, has been sentenced to life for raping a teenage girl.
Read more here
A man has been charged over the rape of a woman 15 years ago,
following a review of the case by officers at Greater Manchester Police.
Read more here
Hundreds
of Kenyans marched in the streets of Nairobi, calling for the end of rapes and
other abuses being committed against girls and women in Darfur. The march is
one of several events planned worldwide through Sunday to call for an end to
violence in the war-torn region of western Sudan. Cathy Majtenyi reports for
VOA from Nairobi.
Read more here
A British chess prodigy has spoken to a court from beyond
the grave to accuse her "hated" father of a series of childhood rapes.
Read more here
Juries are reluctant to convict men of rape if the woman
who brings the allegation was drunk, research has found.
Read more here
The South African government has been condemned for its
"complete silence" over the high level of rape reported by Zimbabwean women
applying for asylum, at the hands of the security forces in their country.
Read more here
Criminals under the supervision of the probation service have
been convicted of nearly 100 murders and more than 500 other serious violent and
sexual offences, including rape, over the past two years, according to official
figures out yesterday.
Read more here
When Amanda stepped off a boat in Southampton, earlier this
year, she had, she says, just escaped a police cell in West Africa where she had
been raped, sexually assaulted and tortured by guards and fellow prisoners.
Read more here
A high-profile move by the Government to boost the conviction
rate in rape cases appears to have had no effect on the way jurors view alleged
rapists, according to new research.
Read more here
A girl raped by a known paedophile was "failed" by procedures
designed to supervise him in the community, it emerged today.
Read more here
The good news that was found was from a report from Ireland -
The Dublin Rape Crisis Centre( DRCC) has welcomed the allocation of €2.5 million
in the Budget for Sexual Assault Treatment Units and €4.5 million of ring-fenced
funding for rape crisis centres and refuges. Ellen O'Malley Dunlop, CEO of
Dublin Rape Crisis Centre said: "We are delighted that the Minister for Health
and Children, Mary Harney, has provided the much needed funding for two new
Sexual Assault Units( SATUs), in Galway and the Midlands and the upgrading of
the existing units.
Read more here
November
Amnesty - 16 Days of Activism
November 25 is International Day Against
Violence Against Women and for 16 days, until December 10 - Human Rights Day
– you can take a different action every day. Tell the world about the human
rights scandal of violence against women and make governments act on their
obligations to women.
www.amnesty.org/actforwomen
Email
The Truth About Rape are having to close
its email until further notice. The email address to request postcards will
remain live but all other addresses will be unanswered until further notice.
This is due to a lack of resources to maintain any service in this area.
End
Violence Against Women - One - Report on Government Performance
On
Thursday 23rd November the End Violence Against Women Campaign (EVAW)
published a new report that reveals how one year after the first independent
assessment of government efforts to join up work on violence against women
in the UK, there is still a failure to ensure that women are safe. The
report –
‘Making the Grade? The second annual independent analysis of
Government initiatives on violence against women’
- has awarded the UK Government an overall score of just
two out
of ten,
a small improvement on last year’s score of one out of ten. Following last
year’s assessment, Tony Blair responded by predicting that a fresh
assessment in a year’s time would show “considerable and sustained
improvements”.
Whilst
some departments, particularly the Crown Prosecution Service and the Home
Office, score well, the report finds little progress overall and the good
work being done in some areas, is being undermined by the lack of a strategy
End Violence Against Women - Two - Survey Results
Campaign group End
Violence Against Women conducted a poll which was released on November 20th
about youth attitudes to violence and sexual violence. The survey found that
42% of 16-20 year olds know a girl who has been hit by her boyfriend, 40%
know a girl coerced into sex and 77% feel not enough support and guidance is
available for youngsters facing such situations.
A further 8% think if
a boy has spent time and money on a girl he is entitled to expect sex and up
to 27% are not sure whether or not this is a reason for a man to expect sex.
Also where the girl is thought to have had several sexual partners, where
the girl has been flirting with him or where she wants to stop sexual
activity part way through, in each case up to 14% or more of respondents
thought he could expect to have sex.
For more on this go to
http://www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/news.asp
Thanks
to our Supporters
We wanted to stop for a minute and say thank you to all of
our supporters. We know that many of you do not want to be named and give
money and time and energy without any thought of getting something back but
every now and again it is good to reflect on the vast numbers of wonderful
people that support the TAR campaign. This month we have received a number
of cheques, from £15 from one individual, to £165.56 from the girls at
Newlands' Girls School, Berks who raised the money for us. The PayPal
facility on the Donations
page is a quick and easy way of making a donation and for buying cards. So
whether your support is in spirit, ideas, action or cash we want to say
THANK YOU!
March
through Edinburgh - 7th December
Edinburgh Women's Rape and Sexual Abuse
Centre are organising a march through central Edinburgh on Thursday 7th
December as part of the 16 days to End Violence Against Women. As part of
their awareness materials they will be using their own adaptation of the TAR
postcards. Rape Crisis Scotland and the Scottish Executive Communities
Minister will be speaking at the event.
For more information please contact
Edinburgh Women's Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre
info@ewrasac.org.uk
0131 557 6737
Violence
Against Women
One...
There will be a conference on 4
December 2006 in London that will be an opportunity to consider how public
bodies should respond to violence against women under their forthcoming
responsibility to promote gender equality. The conference aims to support
public bodies in responding to their responsibilities under the gender duty,
promote integrated approaches to tackle violence against women and provide
examples of good practice. For further information contact Thelma Jarrett at
thelma.jarrett@londoncouncils.gov.uk
or on 020 7934 9807.
Two...
The End Violence Against Women campaign
has commissioned researchers at the Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit at
London Metropolitan University to prepare a paper on how the Commission for
Equality and Human Rights can deal with violence across the equality
strands. The researchers are seeking the views of people working in
different areas of equality. For further information please email
miranda.horvath@gmail.com
Three...
Who's Perverting the Course of Justice? Women who cannot
prove they have been raped are being charged with 'perverting the course of
justice' and being vilified by the press. Justice for Women and Eaves Lilith
Project are holding an emergency meeting to address this issue.
When: Tuesday 12th December, 6:30pm - 8:30pm
Where: The Ainsworths Centre, 42 Welbeck Street, LONDON W1G 8DU (Tube: Bond
Street)
This is a free event, but donations towards costs are appreciated. For more
information visit:
www.eaves4women.co.uk
Places are limited, book now
by emailing your name and address to:
cat.whitehouse@eaveshousing.co.uk
Reclaim
the Night March
RECLAIM THE NIGHT 2006 -
International Day to End Violence Against Women.
25th Nov - 6pm - Trafalgar
Square
Don't forget to put Reclaim
the Night 2006 in your diary! This year's march is bigger and better,
followed by a mixed rally and Reclaim The Right to Party party at University
of London Union, Malet Street (nearest tube Goodge Street).
The march is women only. Event
open to all.
In Britain, there are an
estimated 47,000 rapes every year. And each year, an estimated 300,000 women
are sexually assaulted (British Crime Survey 2001). Yet Britain's conviction
rate is the lowest ever, at just 5.3 per cent. In the work place, 1 in 2
women are sexually harassed (Equal Opportunities Commission 2000). Now more
than ever women must come together to say 'no' to violence against women.
See
www.ldn.feministnetwork.ik.com for more information.
ATTITUDES
ABOUT RAPE
Invitation
to participate in an online study (Sussex University/University of
Potsdam)
Anja Berger
(Department of Psychology,
University of
Potsdam) invites you to
participate in an online survey: "We are studying attitudes about rape and
their impact on judgements about defendants and complainants. In particular,
we are concerned with the views of members of the general public potentially
eligible for jury service who may be put in a position to decide about rape
complaints in court - which would apply to every
UK citizen
above 18. To address our research questions, we have developed an online
questionnaire to measure views about rape and judgements about a number of
hypothetical rape cases. We have done a similar study in
Germany already, and
would like to compare results with answers of people from the
UK since our law systems
differ to some extent (e.g. there is a jury system in the
UK, while in
Germany there
is not)." You'll find the anonymous survey at
http://www.w-lab.de/jury_me06.html
Please note
that the scenarios may be disturbing and that there are a number of them
October
Anti-Drinking Campaign Feeds
the Myth that Alcohol is the Cause of Rape
Jennifer Drew TAR member writes - The
UK Government has just launched a new 'anti-binge drinking' campaign which
is targeted at young men and women, warning of the dangers of drinking to
excess, since it can increase 'young people's chances of being raped and/or
physically attacked.' Unfortunately once again women's bodies are being sexually
exploited. One print advertisement shows the image of a naked young woman lying
alongside a road after having been raped whilst intoxicated. According to
this advertisement because the woman drank to excess alcohol alone was
responsible for a man raping her, not the fact a man seized this opportunity to
rape a drunken woman. Most male on female rapes are not committed in
public spaces. There was no need to show the image of a naked woman yet
again. Such images normalise sexual voyeurism of women's bodies. Why
no image of a naked man after having been raped whilst intoxicated by a male?
The message being sent to young women and men is that alcohol alone causes men
to rape women and therefore it is women's responsibility NOT men's to ensure men
do not rape them whilst they are intoxicated. Irrespective of whether not a
woman is drunk, rape is a crime. Alcohol is only one factor - not the cause of male
sexual violence against women as this campaign claims.
Links are:
http://news.uk.msn.com/Article.aspx?cp-documentid=1072440
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6045818.stm
http://www.knowyourlimits.gov.uk/index.html
September
Sexual History Evidence
Sections 41-43 of the Youth Justice and
Criminal Evidence Act 1999 was campaigned for by the
Campaign to End Rape
and the Rape Crisis Federation to ensure that no sexual history evidence
should be admitted in court unless a judge ruled it as relevant. Research
has now been conducted which shows:
-
the Court of Appeal has understood the
purpose of section 41 and is doing its best to interpret it as a rule of
exclusion. However, some Court of Appeal decisions give cause for concern
that the purpose of the legislation may be undermined.
-
Sexual history evidence was raised in some
cases involving minors, raising concerns that irrespective of the
exploitative nature of the past events, children were more often
represented as sexually active than sexually vulnerable.
-
In addition to specific references to
section 41, references to sexual behaviour/sexual history were found in
over a third of CPS files and observed trials. Sexual history material was
included in more than three-quarters of trials.
-
Almost half of the judges interviewed were
unaware of the Crown Court Rules; some judges had only a vague knowledge
of section 41 and few non-legal practitioners and no complainants
understood the new law.
-
Victims said that they weighed up the issue
of whether sexual history evidence would be raised in court in deciding
whether to report the matter to the police and subsequently in deciding
whether to withdraw the allegation.
-
Police officers, SARC staff and support
agencies all concur that sexual history evidence plays a part in the
decision-making of complainants, especially, but not exclusively, in the
early stages.
-
The Crown Court Rules were frequently
ignored or avoided, with the vast majority of applications being made at
trial and presented verbally. This meant that some of the requirements of
the law ... could be more easily evaded.
-
Some defence counsel appeared to time their
applications to come just before or during cross examination to create the
most pressure on the complainant.
-
Where sexual history material was
introduced without reference to the legislation at all, judges either
failed to notice or failed to sanction the defence for the breach.
The report makes a number of recommendations
including:
The terms ‘sexual behaviour’ and ‘sexual
experience’ should be defined. Moreover, it should be made clear that these
terms include implied as well as express behaviour.
Consideration should be given to amending
section 42(1)(b) which allows the court to give leave for evidence of sexual
behaviour to be admitted as evidence that the defendant had a belief in
consent. The amendment should reflect section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act
2003, which requires a defendant’s belief in consent to be reasonable. It
should also reflect the fact that it is not generally reasonable to
formulate a belief in consent on the basis of past sexual history.
A new exception to the rule of exclusion
should be inserted into section 41, allowing for evidence of previous or
subsequent sexual behaviour with the accused. This exception could have a
time limitation.
There should be a clear statement in the
legislation that sexual behaviour evidence is not to be admitted by trial
judges other than in the exceptional circumstances set out in the
legislation.
Where the complainant has made previous allegations of rape
this should not be an excuse for questioning her about her previous sexual
history simply because these allegations have not been proved in court.
Steps should be taken to ensure that the Crown Court Rules
are observed. There should be an absolute requirement that all applications
be made in writing. Applications should generally have to be made pre-trial.
Applications made at trial should be accepted only if the defence can show
that they were unaware of the information on which the application is based
until trial. Applications made at trial should also have to be made in
writing, and the prosecution should be given time to consider the
application and an adjournment allowed for this purpose if necessary. Judges
should be required to give their decisions and reasons for them in writing
to both sides.
Consideration should be given to permitting complainants to
be present at hearings of applications, if they wish. This would ensure that
allegations about sexual behaviour with the accused before or after the
event in question or with third parties can be tested and that judges can
make informed rulings. It would also mean that they would know what was in
store in any ensuing trial.
There should be a prosecution right of appeal against
decisions to permit the introduction of sexual behaviour evidence.
Read the full report here -
Section 41: an evaluation of new legislation
limiting sexual history evidence in rape trials
August
Excellent Blog
We
are pleased to bring you news of an excellent new blog 'Until Men Stop
Raping'. They want copies of newspaper
cuttings and links, of male sexual violence, abuse and harassment to keep
the blog current so please visit the site and send in your contributions.
Link:
http://untilmenstopraping.blogspot.com/
Take
action to demand justice for women!
Earlier this year Fawcett's Commission
on Women and the Criminal Justice System published its latest report. They
highlighted that large regional variations in rape conviction levels
illustrate a postcode lottery for women victims of violence; and that large
numbers of women in prison simply shouldn't be there, along with other
problems within the system.
You can help them get over the
message that change is needed by sending their report to your local MP or
criminal justice agencies, such as the police or courts. Contact
holly.dustin@fawcettsociety.org.uk
for a copy.
Find out more on the website.
Sentencing Rape
TAR supporter and academic Dr Helen Jones
spoke on BBC Manchester Radio after a
judge sparked outrage by
allowing a
teenager who raped a 12-year old girl to walk free.
The 14-year old boy was said
in court to have stripped the victim of her clothes before brandishing the
kitchen knife in a bid to tell her to keep quiet.
But Judge Jeffrey Lewis gave
him a two year supervision order.
Dr Jones made the point that
nationally the conviction rate for rape is only 5.2% and in Manchester it is
just 3.9%. Although the threshold sentencing point for young men who commit
rape is a community sentence, the Sentencing Guidelines Council has
published its report on
sentencing in rape. Page seven of that
document states:
"Sentences will
need to reflect the precise nature of the activity, and take account of the
impact on the victim, as well as the relationship, if any, between victim
and offender.
Penetrative acts are more serious, as is partial or total nakedness
(especially that of the
victim). Where the victim’s ability to consent is impaired by youth or
mental incapacity,
the
offence becomes more serious."
These factors -
penetration, nakedness and lack of consent - were present in this case. The
document goes on to state that an aggravating factor is - "Use
of a weapon to frighten or injure victim". Certainly in this case the knife
was used to frighten the girl.
For the judge to say the knife was not used to rape is meaningless. He used
the knife to force her to do what he wanted.
The impact of a non-custodial
sentence is three-fold:
- it sends a message to
society that rape is not a serious offence
- it denies the victim
justice and threats the legitimacy of the criminal justice system
- it reduces the length of
time the offender will be on the sex offenders register
Dr Jones made the point that
it is not the law that needs to change but the beliefs of judges who, like
Judge Lewis, think that stripping a 12 year old girl naked at knife point
and then committing a penetrative sex act of rape does not warrant prison.
Full story
While many people may think
this type of offence is rare, there are numerous news reports of teenage
males committing rape.
Boy in court over pool sex attack
Nine years for supermarket rapist
Teenager convicted of sex attacks
Teenager in dock over rape charge
While judges retain the discretion to give
very lenient sentences, any further changes in the law will have no impact.
We must continue to challenge the power of such men to make these decisions.
Do you have a name you'd like to add to the
name and shame
list? Let us know.
July
The New Postcards are Here!
Back in May we announced that the new phase of postcards were
in the final stages of production - well they are now complete!
The new 'Rape Quiz' cards follow the theme of - Here. Now. - which answers
the questions posed such as 'In which country is rape the only crime where the
victim is routinely humiliated in court'?
We've already had tremendous feedback from groups who have
been the first to see them:
"I think they are brilliant. We will be distributing them
at the Freshers Fair at Bangor University" Sally, Chair of Bangor University
Liberal Democrats
Click here
for the new batch.
Congratulations!
Congratulations go to Ashleigh Bridges who has graduated from
Manchester Metropolitan University with a degree in Criminology. Her
dissertation was on rape and we are publishing it as a benchmark to all the
other students who contact us - it is a very interesting piece of work and we
congratulate her on her achievements. Good luck in all you do in the future
Ashleigh.
Responding to Rape -
Ashleigh Bridges
June
Sentencing
The court of appeal has added two years to the minimum
sentence of a babysitter who raped a 12-week-old girl he was looking after.
Read more
Almost 5,000 children are raped each year and yet only 7% of
offenders are convicted.
Read more
The current conviction rate is 5.2% and in one police area it
is less than 1%. (See our Statistics page) The maximum sentence for rape is life - so why is it so rarely
used? What sort of rape would lead a judge to impose the maximum sentence?
The
sentencing guidelines council has just released its proposals for sentencing
on the Sexual Offences Act. See
BBC article for
overview. The proposal
document is huge but pertinent sections include page 18 which summarises
general principles and pages 25 - 29 on rape. Under the proposal the starting
point for the above offence would be 13 years imprisonment.
TAR urges everyone who believes that current sentencing on
rape is weak, to write to the sentencing guidelines council to express your views.
Scotland - rape statistics and
anonymity for men
Convictions for rape continue to plunge in Scotland where the
current conviction rate is just 4.3%. In a
BBC report
the Justice Minister Cathy Jamieson also revealed the number of reported attacks
had almost doubled in the past decade.
At the same time,
Jim Wallace, the Scottish Justice
Minister, is to be thanked for thwarting the demands for anonymity for those men
charged with rape. This is a demand that raises its head every now and again.
Back in 2002 a
Guardian
article considered the issue and Jennifer Temkin made the point that "What
these recent calls for anonymity are really doing, is playing up the argument
that lots of allegations of rape made by women are false, and that men have to
be protected. There is no evidence to suggest that a rape allegation is more
likely than any other sort to be false. On the contrary, why, when prosecution
and conviction rates for rape are so pitifully low and the experience of giving
evidence in court so humiliating, would scores of aggrieved women cry rape and
subject themselves to such an ordeal?"
Men were granted anonymity in cases of rape from 1976 to the 1980s. It
was removed because police found their investigations were impeded.
Demands for anonymity for men accused of rape - and not for
mugging old ladies or murdering people - perpetuates the belief that being
accused of rape is much worse than being accused of anything else because it is
such an awful and extraordinary crime. Awful yes, but not extraordinary - even
the Home Office concedes that at least 80,000 rape occur each year - this makes
it a very ordinary crime and research tells us that it is very 'ordinary' men
who commit such crimes - if only they did have horns and tails we would be able
to recognise them for the monsters that they are.
A letter to Channel 5
A member of TAR emailed Channel 5 to voice her thoughts on a
recent programme. She has not had a reply yet but if you also saw the show you
may want to join her protest by emailing
wrightstuff@five.tv
I am writing to complain about
Thursday's edition of The Wright Stuff
wherein Matthew Wright had a feature concerning marital rape and gang or
as it is actually called group rape.
I am a core member of Truth About Rape and Wright put forward some
extremely offensive comments concerning men committing marital and group
rape. In reality both types of rape are appalling abuses of women's
human rights. No man has the right to rape any woman or girl
irrespective of whether the survivor knows the man or not.
Wright put forward an analogy wherein he compared a woman's experience
of being raped by a man she knew to his own experience of being
physically attacked by a known man. Wright then compared a woman being
raped by a male stranger to his own further experience of being
physically attacked by a group of strange men. Wright in giving this
comparison was totally unhelpful apart from the fact all attacks
were/are committed by men.
Even more unhelpful was Matthew Wright's comments wherein he stated that
'although no means no, surely there's a difference in saying 'yes' three
times and then 'no.' Such comments totally negate the reality that
women must have the right to either give informed consent or to refuse
any unwanted sexual act. It is not for the man to decide which sexual
acts he will engage in irrespective of the woman's desires or wishes.
That is not consent but overt coercion. No man knows what a woman
wants, the only way is to enquire, in the same way, I cannot presume I
have the right to take a man's wallet unless he gives me permission,
otherwise I have committed a criminal offence, namely theft. I do not
have the right to claim that I believed the man had given me permission
to take his wallet. The same applies to women's sexual autonomy it is
theirs alone - not for a man to take and use as and when sees fit, by
claiming he knew what the woman wanted. That is not consent it is rape
or attempted rape.
Rape and sexual assault attacks a woman's sexual identity and her bodily
integrity it is far worse than physical assault. The aim of men
committing sexual violence against women is both to gain sexual access
to the woman and also to degrade her bodily integrity. There is no
comparison between a strange man raping a woman and a husband raping his
wife, both are deliberate violent sexual assaults against the woman's
sexuality and her bodily rights.
Wright's programme instead focused on perpetuating rape myths and
stereotypes concerning women who are raped by known men. For your
information 1 in 7 women are coerced into unwanted sexual activity by a
man, majority of male perpetrators are known to the rape survivor. Out
of 12,760 cases of women reporting they had been raped by a man/men only
673 resulted in the male perpetrator being brought to justice.
Approximately 80,000 women suffer sexual violence committed by males
each year. (Walby and Allen: Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and
Stalking: Findings from The British Crime Survey, 2004).
I would suggest that in future if Matthew Wright and his producers wish
to discuss such an important issue as marital rape and group rape, the
producers invite a panel of experts who understand the complex issues of
why and how male sexual violence against women is overtly condoned and
'normalised.' Rather that Matthew Wright perpetuating the continuation
of stereotypical ideas that 'real rape' only happens when a male
deranged stranger attacks a virginal young girl or an elderly woman.
Sadly rape is an all too common occurrence in women's and girls' lives
and this programme did not help rape survivors but instead only served
to once again trivialise a very serious criminal offence and indirectly
position women as either blame-worthy or 'innocent.' Rape in
reality
is both about men believing they are entitled to sexual access to
a
known woman and also a deliberate attempt to degrade and
humiliate a
woman simply because of her gender.
Attempting to decide whether marital rape is worse for a woman
than
being forced to endure the degradation of a group of strange men
committing multiple rape against her person is totally
irrelevant. The
reality is rape whether it is group rape, acquaintance rape or
more
rarely stranger rape is not only a crime against a woman's body
and
sexuality, but also inflicts severe and long-term damage to the
rape
survivor. More importantly is the fact that still far too many
women
are being left to deal with the after-effects of rape by
themselves.
There are still too few rape crisis centres available to help
rape
survivors rebuild their lives after enduring such traumatic male
sexual
violence.
It would have been more helpful if the discussion had focused on
the
reality that there are large areas within the UK without any rape
crisis
centres at all. Instead women and girls who are rape survivors
are
forced to seek out private professional help if they have
sufficient
funds or else they are left to try and deal with the aftermath
themselves. Little or no attempt is made to understand how males
committing rape has such devastating effects on the rape survivor
and her
relationship with family, friends and society in general.
Instead women
rape survivors continue to be held accountable for men committing
rape.
Or perhaps the Wright Show could have had a discussion on why
male
sexual violence against women continues to increase year on year.
All
too often cultural issues concerning male sexual violence
continues to
be ignored and instead the focus is why so many women are being
raped by
known men.
JENNIFER DREW
CORE MEMBER TRUTH ABOUT RAPE
May
Where To Start?
After a couple of weeks away from the website it seems that
patriarchal men have been extremely busy abusing women. From sexist Police in
the UK to abusive UN Peacekeepers, rape continues to be the common theme.
The new postcards are coming...!
You've all loved the
campaign postcards
- well here is some news - a brand new phase is currently in post-production and
will be available soon. They will be available for viewing on the website just
as soon as I get the images from the designers.
TV
Programme - Undercover Copper
Back in the early 1980s Roger Graef made a documentary on how
Thames Valley Police handled a complaint of rape. His film 'An Allegation of
Rape' caused outrage and widespread public debate on sexism within the police.
25 years later,
Dispatches produced a programme which showed that rape is still treated
lightly. Here, Charlie from
northwestfeminists Yahoo Group describes the programme and wonders why this
did not provoke outrage in 2006:
"Nina Hobson, returned to the police
force after a career break, to film undercover the sexism and apathy in
Leicestershire police force.
One of the issues she wanted to highlight was how the way in which the police
deal with rape is still rooted in sexism. There was one scene, in which a female
police officer was complaining that a Scene of Crime Officer failed to be sent
to the house of a rape victim days after she reported it to the police. The
victim had repeatedly rung the station to find out when someone was going to
collect evidence from her house. In theory evidence should be collected within
24 hours. The female police officer said on camera, that if she was ever raped
she would not go to the police.
There was another incident where a police officer was required to attend a scene
in which a woman was being dragged through a street and roughly treated by a man
in the early hours of the morning. The police couldn't be bothered to attend,
even though the incident could have led to a rape.
There was pornography in the staff areas of the police station. A male police
officer joked with the undercover reporter, wanting to show her an explicit
pornographic video he had on his mobile phone of a woman having sex with a
horse, and he joked that the woman died a few days later as a result. This was
after legislation had been brought in to outlaw downloading such explicit
pornography.
Female officers were also given less important jobs as male officers were
preferred to deal with public disorder.
The chief constable of Leicestershire made out on TV interviews that this
behaviour is the result of individual officers, and refused to accept the idea
that sexism is endemic in the police force.
The programme received press coverage and I saw a few interviews on Channel 4,
so I was hoping that pressure would be sustained by the media to force them to
at least apologise, but this hasn't happened".
northwestfeminists Yahoo Group is a new members only message board - follow
the link for more information.
UN 'PeaceKeepers'
News of
UN
peacekeeping soldiers, government officials, and teachers raping women
and girls has emerged. This remark was made in a Save The Children report.
“Sex with underage girls by humanitarian workers
continues openly,” the report stated. Employees of non-governmental
organisations “are carrying out awareness on sexual exploitation, HIV and
Aids,” one camp resident said, “but during the night hours they are the
same people running after these 12-year-old girls.”
We should not be surprised the cost of survival in
patriarchy is always paid by women and girls.
Elsewhere in the World:
In
Scotland a NINE year old boy has been charged with rape.
In
Mexico police
rape and sexually abuse two dozen women.
In
England a 40 year old man and his 19 year old girlfriend are found
guilty of raping a 12 week old baby.
In
the
States a dozen schoolboys aged 6 to 8 years old will be charged for
allegedly sexually assaulting a female classmate in their school playground.
In
England
eight young girls, aged between seven and 13, were the targets of four men
aged between 42 and 67.
Raping children happens the world over.
Deportation - an unjust
gendered issue
Okay - there has been a huge media hype about the story of
foreign prisoners being released and re-offending - one example is here at
the
Telegraph and another is here at the
BBC.
Okay - we don't want anyone raping women.
But lets just look at the facts -
- Yes the Home Office has managed to lose a thousand or
more foreign offenders who should have been deported from this country
months ago.
- Yes some of these people pose a threat to women
- But we have a conviction rate of 5.6% in this country
- That means of our own home-grown rapists, 94 out of
every 100 reports to the police do not end with a prison sentence
If only there was such a media frenzy about that
little-discussed fact.
At the same time -
Operation Pentameter - a multi-agency taskforce launched in February
2006 to combat trafficking, has discovered 46 sex trafficking victims - one
aged 15. Human rights groups suggest the operation is a campaign to
find and deport illegal immigrants. Amnesty International, claim women who
were brought to the country against their will are being deported if they
refuse to assist with police investigations, in spite of the fact that
branches of the same criminal networks who brought them into Britain await
them in their country of origin. Victims of trafficking are being allowed to
remain in Britain only if they prove beneficial to the Crown Prosecution
Service. Amnesty International's UK director, Kate Allen says "This has led
to some highly vulnerable trafficked women being put into immigration
detention, and even being deported."
April
Sentencing Guidelines Council
Who is currently influencing the Sentencing Guidelines
Council?
In March
reports
suggested that the Sentencing Guidelines Council had plans for future sentences
for rape and other sexual offences to be cut by 15 per cent.
Now news emerges that
the Sentencing Guidelines Council has proposals
to allow perpetrators of domestic violence to avoid jail if they show remorse.
This report on the BBC
shows how such moves have been condemned by domestic violence charities. We also
condemn such an idea. We should all remember that domestic violence frequently
includes sexual violence and that this is often repeated, relentless and
invisible. Rape in marriage is still a big taboo subject in this country.
Any hint or suggestion that the current
overcrowding in the prison population is tackled by reducing the sentences of
men who abuse women must be challenged swiftly.
So we ask again - who is
currently influencing the Sentencing Guidelines Council? We are willing to bet
it isn't someone whose interests lie with female victims of male violence. We
want all women to survive the violences they experience but this is unlikely to
be achieved while the Criminal Justice System seems to be doing its best to deny
basic rights and protections.
In the article a Home Office spokesperson stated "The government believes
prison is for dangerous, violent or sexual offenders, which is why we have
legislated to ensure that such offenders, which includes perpetrators of the
most serious cases of domestic violence, will spend longer in prison and in
some cases be detained indefinitely". The latest proposal from the
Sentencing Guidelines Council does not confirm the sentiments of the Home
Office but instead sends us off into an Orwellian world where the violence
experienced by women is denied by the State and men are set free. Domestic
violence constitutes 25% of all violent crime - the suggestions from the
Sentencing Guidelines Council would certainly help to reduce the prison
population but would send violent men back to continue their violence
against women. We are with Sandra Horley, chief executive of Refuge, who is
quoted as saying it would be a "travesty" if the proposals came into effect
"In short they give men a licence to batter women as long as they are able
to put on a remorseful act in front of a judge".
Rape
Cautions
The
BBC has revealed that the number of rapists given a caution and freed
instead of facing jail terms has more than doubled in the past decade. They cite
Home Office figures which reveal that in 2004, 40 offenders were cautioned for
rape - compared with 19 in 1994.
Rape Crisis chairwoman Nicole Westmarland said: "It is completely
unacceptable that rapists are able to continue living their day-to-day lives
or even be free to rape again. We are shocked... so many cautions have been
given in rape cases. Rape is a crime that has a serious impact on its
victims for years or even decades."
Swedish
Government document on Patriarchal Violence
The
Swedish Government has
published a report which takes a Human Rights approach to dealing with
'Patriarchal Violence' (click to
download the document - Acrobat Reader required). This is probably the first
example of any nation-state government using the term to explain male violence.
UK Government
Consultation
A Consultation Paper - click link to
download (Acrobat Reader required)
Responses are requested on the Government's
plans on changes in rape law. Anyone can send a response in to this document
and the more people that write the stronger our voice will be. If you would
like to say something about the document but would prefer to send it to us
then please email us with your comments at
info@truthaboutrape.co.uk
This consultation paper sets out four
proposals which the Government believe will improve the conviction rate
through:
● strengthening the existing legal framework
● helping to reduce the barriers to effective
prosecution
● improving further our care for victims and
witnesses.
What is the Government consulting on?
In this paper, the Government is consulting on four
proposals:
1.‘Capacity’ in relation to consent
Consent is at the heart of most cases of
rape. This is not simply saying ‘yes’ or ‘no’ but doing so through choice,
and with the freedom and capacity to make that choice. The Government is
seeking views on whether we need to define that capacity in law to assist
the courts and juries in cases where drink or drugs may have impacted upon
the complainant’s ability to choose.
2. Expert evidence
In order to place juries in a more informed
position from which to assess the credibility of a complainant, it is
proposed that prosecutors should be able to present general expert evidence
concerning the psychological impact of sexual offences upon victims.
3. First complaint
The Government would welcome views on whether Section
120(7)(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 should be repealed in order to
ensure that all relevant evidence of complaints made by victims in rape
cases are admissible as evidence in a trial, irrespective of how much time
has passed since the alleged conduct.
4. Special measures: use of pre-recorded video evidence
Views are sought on whether the framework
should be altered so that video recorded statements of complainants
involving serious sexual offences taken by the police will automatically be
admissible as evidence in chief at a trial. This will be subject to the
witness agreeing that they wish to give evidence in this manner, and the
court agreeing to admit the evidence having considered the interests of
justice do not demand otherwise. Views are also sought on proposals to relax
the current restrictions on the prosecution asking the witness questions in
addition to the showing of the video-recorded statement.
Responses to this Consultation Paper
Responses should be sent to:
Stephen Jones
Better Trials Unit
Office for Criminal Justice Reform
Ground Floor Fry Building
2
Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
Tel:
020 7035 8456
Fax:
020 7035 8601
Email:
stephen.jones@cjs.gsi.gov.uk
The
final date for receipt of responses is 31 July 2006.
Comment on Poster Campaign Targeted at Men
WHY ACTIVE
FREELY GIVEN CONSENT IS VITAL IN SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS
AUTHOR – JENNIFER DREW
On 14th March, 2006 the
Government announced a new campaign was being launched in an attempt to
reduce the appalling number of rapes being committed in the UK and at the
same time to raise the conviction level for rape which is now only 5.3%.
(Attrition in Reported Rape Cases, 2005: Kelly et al).
For the first time it is men rather
than women who are being targeted with regards to male sexual violence
against women. This
campaign
focuses on informing men they too have a responsibility of ensuring they
always seek active consent from any prospective sexual partner, before
engaging in sexual activity. On the same day a poll was available on
Sky News website asking the question ‘Should
men always seek verbal consent before engaging in sexual activity.’
15,000 people responded on-line to this poll and 51% said no! Unfortunately
this poll does not provide gendered statistics so there is no way of
ascertaining how many women responded to this poll.
In February, 2006
Andrew Liddiard was convicted of assault and voyeurism wherein he
installed surveillance cameras in the house which he shared with his wife.
Liddiard claimed his wife was having an affair and wished to obtain evidence
by installing cameras in his wife’s bedroom. The Court heard that the
couple had not had a sexual relationship for some years.
Sentencing Liddiard to two years
community service, the Judge told Liddiard ‘It
seems quite clear that the physical aspect had been kept from you for some
considerable time. You installed the cameras and by your say so, you were
able to see certain things going on which might normally have been part of a
physical relationship between two persons. She was your wife and as such it
was a great abuse of the trust that should have existed in your
relationship.’
So what is the connection between the
court case and the new posters informing men they might be charged with rape
unless they seek active consent from a prospective female sexual partner.
On the one hand the Home Office is to be congratulated in targeting men and
reminding them they too have a responsibility of ensuring that a woman has
freely and actively consented to sexual activity, rather than submitting due
to coercion or threats of violence. Yet there is still widespread belief
that in certain circumstances, men have the right and entitlement of sexual
access to a woman’s body. As evidenced by the Liddiard case, the judge
commented that sexual access had been denied. It must not be forgotten that
until 1991 marital rape did not exist within marriage, since husbands ‘owned
their wives’ and once a woman married, she forfeited all rights of refusing
any sexual activity with her husband. Since one of the wife’s primary
duties was never to refuse sexual relations with her husband.
The Home Office poster campaign on
‘consent’ too implies that once a man has gained consent from a woman, he
alone is the one who controls and enacts sexual activity. One poster shows
a woman’s lower body parts only and she is standing passively with a ‘No
Entry’ sign on her genital area. Apparently once a woman has given
‘consent’ any sexual act is permitted. In other words women can only say
yes or no, they do not have the right of deciding for themselves which if
any, sexual acts they wish to engage in but rather once consent has been
given, sexual activity is then controlled and driven by the man. The same
day as the Home Office announced their new campaign, the BBC news website
invited individuals to comment on the campaign. Overwhelmingly men who
wrote in all said they objected and resented the idea of having to actually
ask a woman if she consented to sexual contact. What does this tell us
about the validity and acceptance of women’s rights to own their bodies and
sexualities? It would appear that sexual acts between women and men need no
verbal communication because apparently both men and women know precisely
what their partner desires and it is always what the man desires.
The real problem is how our society
constructs heterosexual relationships. Dominant heterosexual scripts say
that men are not supposed to ask women if they desire to engage in any
sexual activity, rather it is for the man to initiate and control sexual
contact. Women are not supposed to express sexual desire, but instead can
only passively respond to male sexual advances or again passively refuse.
At the same time it is the woman’s responsibility alone to ensure she has
not inadvertently sent any ‘wrong signals implying she wants sexual contact
to the man.’ If she has, then she alone is responsible for being raped or
forced to engage in unwanted sexual activity.
Irrespective of whether women are
married, in a current sexual relationship, have been in a relationship with
a man in the past, or wish to commence a new sexual relationship, it is
their right to decide what if any, sexual acts they wish to engage in.
Mutually freely given active consent must always be obtained by both parties
before a man or woman proceeds to engage in heterosexual activity.
The Home Office campaign is a step in
the right direction, but unfortunately the message is lost since one of the
posters stereotypically defines women as sexualized objects. Future
campaigns which target men’s attitudes and beliefs must not adhere to
sexualized stereotypes of female sexuality if the sexual rights of all women
is not to be trivialized but rather accepted as pivotal to all women’s human
rights. Too many girls and boys are still growing up believing men are
entitled and have the right to force women and girls into unwanted sexual
activity. That a woman alone is responsible for controlling and regulating
male sexual desires, rather than men being held responsible for their own
sexual actions.
March
Government plans - mixed messages?
In an article in the
Guardian
29th March 2006 the solicitor general, Mike O'Brien, said that, while the
number of complaints of rape had risen sharply, convictions had only increased
slightly: "An awful lot of people who are committing rapes are getting away with
it." Home office minister Fiona McTaggart said: "There is clear evidence that
the mismatch between convictions and reports suggests there are people who have
raped who don't get convicted." We couldn't agree more.
He has announced proposed changes which are contained in a
consultation document aimed at increasing the conviction rate. Last year,
14,000 rapes were reported but only one in 20 resulted in a conviction.
Proposals include:
- To make video interviews with rape victims
automatically admissible in all cases - currently they are only allowed
when the victim is under 18.
- To allow experts to give evidence about an alleged rape
victim's general behaviour after the attack, bringing the UK more in line
with the way rape trials are conducted in the US, Canada and Australia.
- To redefine the law on when a person consents to sex
Earlier this month
reports
suggested that the Sentencing Guidelines Council (SGC) had plans
for future sentences for rape and other sexual offences to be cut by 15 per
cent. Such mixed messages do little to show any evidence of joined up
thinking on the law and punishment. These suggestions were made as a move to
relieve pressure on Britain's overcrowded male prisons - not as a
solution to deal with rapists more effectively. Rape charities said such an
idea risked damaging women's confidence in the legal system. 'The decision
on whether to go to court will be harder if women think the rapist will not
receive an adequate sentence,' said a spokeswoman for
South Essex
Rape and Incest Crisis Centre.
Government
Campaign
On March 15 2006, the Home Office launched a £500,000
advertising campaign - on the pages of lads' magazines, on the radio and in
men's toilets in bars and clubs - urging men to ensure that their partners
consent to sex. The
adverts
are supposed to be shocking: using provocative imagery and 'frank' language,
they are meant to make men think labout the consequences of sex without
prior consent.
Object,
an organisation that campaigns against the objectification of women,
suggests that this is however a misguided campaign:
"How can an ad that objectifies women and is sexually
crass challenge attitudes to rape?"
"The fact that this probably is the only way to get any
message to men who are most likely to force sex, says it all" s
"It's a start, I guess, but it's the culture, the very
lads' mags that will carry these ads, that need to be challenged."
Object is worried that the ads will insult men who would
never rape, be lost on those that do and insult all women in the process.
There is a wider campaign that needs to be fought and that is the campaign
against the rape culture that exists in this country and which supports a
host of myths which act to throw the blame onto women, shifting
responsibility away from men, the media and the government itself.
Domestic Violence: 21st Century Responses
Conference on Wednesday 15th March 2006
1:30-3:30 pm
Manchester Metropolitan University, All Saints West 2.10
Speakers
Caroline Jones, Co-Chair of Broken Rainbow LGBT Domestic Violence
Service UK
'Domestic Violence and the LGBT Community'.
Paula Wilcox Senior Lecturer in Criminology and Sociology in the
School of Applied Social Science at the University of Brighton.
'Surviving domestic violence: gender, poverty and agency'
ALL WELCOME
Attendance is free but places are limited. If you wish to attend
please email
c.little@mmu.ac.uk
Organised by the Gender and Sexuality Research Group which is
part of the Institute for Culture,
Gender and the City
Report on
Rape Investigations by Metropolitan Police
The review found differences in the
proportion of offences ‘solved’ and the proportion of allegations recorded
as ‘no crime’ or ‘not crime’ in different parts of London.
Read the
full report.
Women's Call for Peace: An Urgent Appeal
The
women of the United States, Iraq and women worldwide, have had enough
of the senseless war in Iraq and the cruel attacks on civilians around
the world. We've buried too many of our loved ones. We've seen too
many lives crippled forever by physical and mental wounds. We've
watched in horror as our precious resources are poured into war while
our families' basic needs of food, shelter, education and healthcare
go unmet. We've had enough of living in constant fear of violence and
seeing the growing cancer of hatred and intolerance seep into our
homes and communities.
This
is not the world we want for ourselves or our children. With fire in
our bellies and love in our hearts, we women are rising up - across
borders - to unite and demand an end to the bloodshed and the
destruction.
We
have seen how the foreign occupation of Iraq has fueled an armed
movement against it, perpetuating an endless cycle of violence. We are
convinced that it is time to shift from a military model to a
conflict-resolution model that includes the following elements:
-
The withdrawal of all foreign troops and foreign fighters from Iraq;
-
Negotiations to reincorporate disenfranchised Iraqis into all
aspects of Iraqi society;
-
The full representation of women in the peacemaking process and a
commitment to women's full equality in the post-war Iraq;
-
A
commitment to discard plans for any foreign bases in Iraq;
-
Iraqi control of its oil and other resources;
-
The nullification of privatization and deregulation laws imposed
under occupation, allowing Iraqis to shape the trajectory of the
post-war economy;
-
A
massive reconstruction effort that prioritizes Iraqi contractors,
and draws upon financial resources of the countries responsible for
the invasion and occupation of Iraq;
-
Consideration of a temporary international peacekeeping force that
is truly multilateral and is not composed of any troops from
countries that participated in the occupation.
To
move this peace process forward, we are creating a massive movement of
women - crossing generations, races, ethnicities, religions, borders
and political persuasions. Together, we will pressure our governments,
the United Nations, the Arab League, Nobel Peace Prize winners,
religious leaders and others in the international community to step
forward to help negotiate a political settlement. And in this era of
divisive fundamentalisms, we call upon world leaders to join us in
spreading the fundamental values of love for the human family and for
our precious planet.
Sign On
Today! Please join
CODEPINK's
Women Say No to War campaign, and add your name to the thousands of women
and men who have already signed the Urgent Call for Peace in Iraq.
CODEPINK
is gathering over 100,000 signatures on this Call, and the need your
signature, and your help, to do it! On
International Women's Day, March 8, they will deliver these signatures to
U.S. embassies, consulates, and federal offices all over the world.
Go to
http://www.womensaynotowar.org/
to sign the call and to learn where events are happening! Visit
http://www.womensaynotowar.org/
for details.
Fawcett
campaign on violence against women
By International Women's Day on March
8, we want 200 MPs to have signed a call for Government action on violence
against women. You can help by urging your MP to do so. Fawcett have made it
easy to get involved,
find out how on their website.
Petition to fight trafficking
during the World Cup
petition @:
http://www.pes.org/content/view/346?lang=en
Please sign by 8th MARCH
This petition has just been brought to our attention by the
European Women's Lobby
http://www.womenlobby.org
Women in London
Focus on International Women's Day
Help for Adult Victims of Child Abuse
HAVOCA - A non-profit making
organisation based in the UK dedicated to provide help, support and information
to any adult who is suffering from past childhood abuse.
February
Rape Crisis Scotland use TAR postcard
For a copy of the newsletter contact
Rape
Crisis Scotland.
Request
for Panel Members
Calling women in the North
West.
The
British Transport Police,
are recruiting for a Citizens' Panel and Community Forum.
Purpose of the Citizens'
Panel
The Citizens' Panel aims
to provide a way to engage with the community. It will benefit BTP and panel
members in a number of ways:
-
The Panel will increase
BTP's visibility in the community
-
Panel members are given
the opportunity to voice there concerns and opinions about crime on the
rail network and can work with BTP to ensure effective changes
-
Panel members will
receive feedback regarding the consultations they help with along with a
newsletter summarising findings of
other research projects and
Community Forums.
What
does being a Panel Member involve?
·
Panel members will be asked to respond to
no more than four paper surveys per year. They may also be asked to
participate in a limited number of telephone surveys and group or
individual interviews
·
Community Forums will also be held to
discuss issues regarding crime on the railways (see below)
Community Forum -
Anti-Social Behaviour on the
Railways
·
A Community Forum will be taking place on
March 1st 2006 to discuss anti-social behaviour on the railways
·
The Forum is being held at a central
Manchester location and respondents are asked to contact BTP at
NWCitizensPanel@btp.pnn.police.uk or fax 020 7383 3023 with their
address for a formal
invitation.
·
If there are any questions about the forum,
you can contact BTP on 020 7830 8911
Events for International Women's Day
Wednesday 8th March 2006 - International Women’s Day,
FUNNY WOMEN STAND UP - Doors open 7.00 pm, Show starts 8.00 pm
London – W1
Featuring the best of female stand-up the show takes place on
International Women's Day, at the Cafe Royal on Regent Street,
London W1. Box office and other funds raised on the night will go
to V-Day: Until the Violence Stops,
www.vdayuk.org, which campaigns to end violence against women.
This is a ticketed event and you can book your tickets via the 24-Hours
Advance Tele-Sales Number: 0870 163 3408 and quote the following password:
FWSU8306
Ticket price is £20 to include a drinks reception courtesy of Turner Road
Wine. If you don't take advantage of this opportunity now you can still buy
online @
www.funnywomen.com or
www.ticketmaster.co.uk - but please note that tickets will go on sale to
the public on Monday 20th February 2006.
For more events in London and elsewhere
Click Here
Drink 'spike tests' putting Women at
Risk
Drink-spiking tests that
were hailed as fool-proof protection against date rape are putting women at
risk by giving inaccurate or misleading results. The DIY kits include
dip-sticks, credit-card size coasters and litmus paper-style strips that are
designed to change colour on contact with sex assault drugs such as Rohypnol
and gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB). These devices
have been endorsed by police forces and rape charities that say they enable
women to safeguard their drinks against spikers.
But a study by the Centre for Public Health at Liverpool John
Moores University has found that some types of
kits produce such unclear results that anyone in a dimly lit bar would find
them hard to read. Other tests produced inaccurate results' one kit tried
out by researchers in laboratory conditions identified the presence of drugs
in fewer than half of cases. The same test also gave false positives or
unclear results in around a quarter of cases where no date-rape chemicals
were present in the drink.
Dr Caryl Beynon,
lead author of the report, said that these tests may give women false
reassurance that their drink is safe - or unnecessarily scare them that it
is not. She added that getting people drunk or secretly topping up their
drinks with shorts is still a far more common method of spiking than using
drugs.
"Public concern about the use of illegal drugs in sexual assaults can
take the focus away from the most commonly used date-rape drug, alcohol,"
said Dr Beynon, an expert in drug misuse.
"Buying someone larger drinks, encouraging them to drink beyond their
capacity or slipping shorts into lower alcohol drinks are a far more common
and effective way of drink spiking."
No national figures exist to give a clear picture of whether drugs such as
Rohypnol and GHB are a common feature in sexual assaults. More than 754,000
women in the UK over the age of 16 are estimated to have been the victims of
rape, but there have been only 15 successful prosecutions for drug-assisted
sexual assault in the past five years.
The Government has promised action, with a review by its drugs advisers of
the classifications of both Rohypnol and GHB, which are currently class C
drugs. Some experts endorse the view, however, that alcohol is more
significant. A study by the University of Surrey, published in 2004, found
that alcohol played a role in three out of every four date rapes or sexual
assaults. They concluded that alcohol was used by those
intent on sexual assault, with attackers more likely to take advantage of
victims who had been drinking.
Source:
Independent
Fourteen
year old guilty of rape
A 14 year old boy who was arrested last year for
allegedly raping four young girls aged between 7 and 10, when they were playing
in a public park in Manchester, pleaded guilty to rape. The 14 year old boy
denied four further sex charges.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/4662778.stm
The Sleepwalking Rapist – 20th December 2005
A
man accused of raping a female friend was unanimously cleared of rape at
York Crown Court, after using the defence that he was sleepwalking.
Commenting in the Daily Mail, Dr Ishaad Ebrahim, medical director of the
London Sleep Centre, said that it was difficult to use sleepwalking
convincingly as a defence.
Sex suspect given work at school is jailed for assault – 25th January 2006
A suspected sex offender who was
ordered to work at a primary school as part of a community punishment order
was jailed yesterday for indecently assaulting a girl. Ian Missing had been
approved to work at the school after admitting an unrelated assault charge,
despite previously being arrested on suspicion of a sex attack on a child
and of internet pornography offences. He was not charged at the time
because of lack of evidence and the information was not passed to the
probation service.
Comic Relief
Comic Relief provides a funding
stream for organisations working with refugees & asylum seekers, including
refugee women who have experienced sexual violence. There is a cyclical
grant programme for awards over 5000, with the next deadline being 5th
May. There are strict criteria for eligibility, which can be explored via
their website:
http://www.comicrelief.com/applyforagrant/sa/Question1.shtml
Comic Relief will consider
applications for awards under 5000 which focus on older people, mental
health, or disadvantaged communities at any time, but organisations must
have an annual turnover of below 150,000 to be eligible. More information
can be found here:
http://www.comicrelief.com/applyforagrant/grants-uk-rnd.shtml
Victim’s Fund 2006 – 2006
The Victim’s Fund from the Home
Office specifically focuses on sexual violence. The deadline for
applications is Friday 17 February 2006. More information is available via
email:
VictimsFund@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk or from
www.governmentfunding.org.uk
January 2006
Start of the Year
Every year I start this page hoping that we will be able to close the website
because of a lack of need.
Every year I hope that there will be an end to rape: that men will stop using
their bodies to violate the bodies of women and children.
I remain hopeful - despite the odds - because hope is what keeps us all
going.
I know the year ahead will bring us more tales of horror and unspeakable
terror. It is our job to speak the truth about such horror and to tell the world
about the terror that men inflict on women and children.
We are proud to be women - proud to be feminists.
And so we continue - happy new year everyone - let's hope it's the year we
can shut this website!
"You can rest assured that if any guilt is identified at the end of the day, action will be taken to terminate that relationship immediately and steps will be made to make sure that those people do not find themselves in these positions of power that they can abuse again."
What is he saying???? - "If". "At the end of the day". "That relationship".
NO NO NO - no 'if' - abuse IS happening - there is no 'relationship' - there is abuse.